Shaun – funny you mention those names. When I saw the Medlen announcement this morning, I thought about how bad it was during the 2008 season. Here are starting pitchers from that year and the number of starts they made:
JJ – 31
Campillo – 25
Hudson – 22
Jo Jo – 22
Charlie Morton – 15
Hampton and Glavine – 13 each
No bueno. Any thoughts as to why so many braves seem to go down with tj related problems? Are we above average hit by this? I know there was debate about over use of our mid relief but starters? Just part of the game? Like botox in Hollywood?
What I don’t like: big money, injury risk due to history, and what this likely means for Medlen’s status.
What I do like: proven starter, he’ll be pitching in a friendlier division (and league), and he’s got plenty of reasons to pitch his way into a bigger payday next year.
And before we start saying, “so the Braves had $14.1 M sitting around this whole time?!?!”, I’m guessing that this is a situation where the front office went to Liberty Media and asked for some more help.
David, the Braves could be the Yankees, if Liberty Media wanted them to be. The budget constraints are self-imposed to allow Liberty to make more money. And they can get away with it because the Braves don’t draw all that many fans, relative to other teams, and they have a sub par local TV deal. So they do have $14.1 million sitting around.
Of course, there is some good that comes out of Liberty imposing a limited budget on the Braves. Instead of signing a lot of older stars and them getting older together, and contending cyclically that way, they are encouraged to develop their own players and they can sign them long-term when it’s worth doing so, like they just did.
@34 – FWIW, I’m much more in favor of the move then I was a few days ago. It had to be done. The season was slipping away before it started with Medlen gone and Beachy a question mark. The only real, tangible downside (I’m removing the lost draft pick from this b/c that’s a crap shoot to some degree, that low in the first round) is that the team likely has no money now at the trade deadline. But, the problem was today, not in July.
Steve @35, yes, and it’s easy to argue that it’s better to get a Santana now, when you have him for the full season, than to wait until July to fix a problem, when you only have that player for 2-3 months. If it is an overpay, better to overpay for a guy that should contribute something for the whole season than to overpay for 2-3 months of value.
At least, he should have a “workout buddy” in Meds…
IF they both need it…
Still an IF, so we have some hope.
Upside to both needing it, our rookies and 2nd year pitchers will get a lot more experience and we can see a little more of what we have and they should be a bit more ready for post season (hopefully)… if not this year, then next…
Yeah, Will, I don’t know exactly what that stat means. I know the Braves draft tons of pitchers, so does that have something to do with it? Or are they just terrible with their pitchers. I certainly think Bobby and Fredi are guilty of riding guys, but is it egregious? No idea.
I’ve heard that a lot of sports medicine folks tend to agree that pitchers who start having elbow issues early in their pro career attribute it to poor mechanics and undiciplined/unhealthy work habbits that they developed earlier from their teenage years. It’s not something that develops over night.