Show #92: We Sit Down with Braves Great, Javy Lopez
Javy Lopez discusses a wide range of topics including the ’95 Series, the ’96 Series, his relationship with Maddux, and much, much more.
359 Responses to “Show #92: We Sit Down with Braves Great, Javy Lopez”
Pages: « 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 … 15 » Show All
Pages: « 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 … 15 » Show All
February 7th, 2010 at 2:15 pm
*”the talk do about him” is Over-studied Dutchman for “they do talk about them”
February 7th, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Alright, I apologize to ABT for tainting the comments section of the best interview with icky personal crap. Steve & company, do feel free to erase those posts.
Go Braves!
February 7th, 2010 at 2:53 pm
If your comments are “personal crap” what should I call #173 and my sick feeling? So does anyone know for sure if the caveman has for sure signed with the Tigers? I heard rumblings but nothing definitive.
February 7th, 2010 at 2:54 pm
For sure? Fo’ shizzle? Sho’ nough?
February 7th, 2010 at 3:01 pm
I dunno, but I had that same dream just last night. And I was like, “Leah, put some pants on, girl!” *Ba-dum, bum ctchhhhhh* [crickets]
February 7th, 2010 at 3:26 pm
Ok…that comment was almost as funny as your t-shirt comment re: 7″ from the previous show. Almost woke up Rev. From his Sunday slumber with my laughter.
February 7th, 2010 at 4:15 pm
Leah, I couldn’t find anything for you on Damon & the Tigers being definite. I would think they’ll snag him, though. I don’t think Detroit is as willing to go to camp with their current team as Atlanta is, and they have a passionate owner who I expect would like the idea of a superstar, aged or not.
February 7th, 2010 at 7:54 pm
Superbowl Halftime Post.
Go BRAVES!!!!!!!!
February 7th, 2010 at 8:09 pm
Whoooooo are you who who who who. Whoooooooooo are you.
February 7th, 2010 at 9:31 pm
Oh poor Peyton.
February 7th, 2010 at 9:31 pm
Yup. That’s poop.
February 7th, 2010 at 10:35 pm
Just like I called it, Colts by 17
February 7th, 2010 at 10:39 pm
How many minutes after the interception before you and Steve got Hammy’s “Who dat” text?
February 7th, 2010 at 11:04 pm
he’s humble
February 8th, 2010 at 9:47 am
Yes – big props to Hammy. Who not only had it over Curt and I in the SB department, but most of the country as well.
So – what did y’all think of the Who’s performance? They were my first rock band as a teenager. The first band that I went crazy for, bought every piece of vinyl they ever produced, every boot leg, had countless t-shirts, posters, etc. All of which to say my critical eye is not too sharp when it comes to them.
Bub – sycophant is such a tremendous word. I was jazzed about that post for quite a while.
Chuck James – I’ve got to tell you that your DOB blog moniker has been my favorite for years. Well done.
February 8th, 2010 at 5:49 pm
If something doesn’t happen soon, I’m going back to my bottom of the barrel baseball puns.
Hey, what did God say after the first man died?
Adam Dunn.
What did the bullpen say to the nosy young reporter dude?
“Boyer Medlen too much.”
[dodging tomato]
February 8th, 2010 at 7:27 pm
Somebody else loves us.
http://www.baseballprojection.com/2010/standings2010.htm
February 8th, 2010 at 7:28 pm
Can’t quite understand the Mariners being tagged for last place, but whatever. They picked Atlanta so they’re flippin’ geniuses.
February 8th, 2010 at 7:30 pm
#192 – nice link, Bub. Poor Nats. Such a nice stadium…doesn’t deserve sub-par play and empty seats.
February 8th, 2010 at 7:37 pm
I kind of like the idea of the Nationals doing well in that park, too. Also, haven’t mentioned it before, but I think they have the best name of any expansion team. Sounds so old school: The Nationals. If they weren’t in our own division, I’d probably pull for them as a second club.
February 8th, 2010 at 7:38 pm
And by expansion team, I of course mean… team that moved cities… in the last 20 years… among those ones.
February 8th, 2010 at 9:35 pm
They should have called them the Senators. I know that:
1. That harkens back to several failed – see moved – franchises
2. There is a hockey team of the same name
but to me the Senators is a classic for the DC market and franchise. And there is some great history there. That said, I too am a closet Nats fan as my wife’s family is in DC.
February 8th, 2010 at 10:00 pm
I dunno. To me, “Nationals” sounds more rugged, while still sounding patrio-political. (Yeah, I made that word up.) But I guess if I had a bunch of old Senators sports images to cancel out the suit & tie images, it might be different.
February 8th, 2010 at 10:07 pm
Steve, I liked The Who although I’m afraid they must have needed oxygen after the show. They did also make me want to watch old CSI episodes.
February 8th, 2010 at 10:17 pm
You know, Walter Johnson played for the Senators.
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/multimedia/photo_gallery/0605/gallery.intimidatingpitchers/images/Walter_Johnson.jpg